Many chronic pain patients have been not been helped by traditional medical care. As a result, they have turned to alternative ways to deal with their pain. There isn’t much evidence yet to support complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches. What do we know so far?
In this report, researchers review all systematic reviews published about a wide range of CAM treatments. They searched seven different databases to find articles on any treatment-related topics on CAM.
There were five systematic reviews that met the standard set of requirements for quality and design. Fifteen other trials also met the requirements to be included. Studies in all languages were accepted.
All patients included had chronic neuropathic or neuralgic pain. This means the primary (main) area involved was the nervous system. For this study, nervous system referred to two parts: the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord) or the peripheral nervous system (spinal nerves leaving the spinal cord).
Patients with multiple sclerosis, limb amputations, diabetes, shingles, and stroke were part of the studies. Symptoms of nervous system lesions included sensations of burning, stabbing, tingling, and/or numbness. There is no obvious change in the affected nerve when it’s examined. That’s why it’s been so hard to find a cure or effective treatment for this problem.
There were seven types of CAM treatments studied. These included acupuncture, electrostimulation, herbal medicine, magnets, dietary supplements, guided imagery, and spiritual healing. Here’s what they found:
As CAM becomes more and more popular, more studies to assess their effectiveness will be done. For now, there are only a few limited systematic reviews to help us understand the benefit of these alternative treatment methods.
The authors point out the difficulty of conducting quality studies in this area. Finding a way to include a control group can be difficult. These are patients who don’t receive CAM for their pain. And the funding of CAM studies is very limited at this time.
With the positive early findings, there is hope that more good quality trials will be conducted. There is some concern about overrepresenting positive results and underreporting negative results by researchers who are enthusiastic about this new treatment approach.
In summarizing the studies reviewed, the authors say there is some evidence to support CAM in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Capsaicin topical cream had the best results. Further study is needed for all other modalities before recommendations can be made and treatment guidelines are published.