Our 16-year-old son tore his ACL along with his knee meniscus playing soccer. We’ve heard an awful lot about how these kind of injuries don’t heal for some adults. What about kids? Does he stand a better chance because of his age?

As more and more children and teens participate in organized sports at a younger age, it is no surprise that knee injuries are on the rise. Fractures and overuse injuries top the list but tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are becoming more common as well. And many times if the trauma creates enough force to tear the ACL, it’s enough to injure the soft tissues such as the meniscus (cartilage).

But as you have found out, studies do show that ACL reconstruction with meniscal repair in younger patients have better results than in adults. By younger patients, we are referring to children and teens who have not reached full bone growth. They are said to be skeletally immature.

It’s likely that while younger patients are still in the growth phase of development, their ability to heal is increased compared with adults. Growth hormones and other growth factors that aid in bone growth also assist in recovery from injuries.

There is also another reason why patients with ACL injuries combined with meniscal tears have better results now. And that is the improved surgical techniques designed to minimize trauma to the growth plate. In the past, any disruption to the growth plate (whether from surgical trauma or injury), could result in chronic joint stiffness and even growth arrest. If the bone stops growing prematurely for any reason, the child or teen can end up with one leg shorter than the other.

Surgeons are still researching the best way to repair or reconstruct torn ligaments and soft tissues of the knee in skeletally immature patients. Efforts to avoid the growth plate do seem to pay off with better results in the short-term. Long-term studies are not available yet. More research is needed to find the best way to treat each type of traumatic knee injury in this age group.

Our 11-year-old boy is a bit on the chubby side so we signed him up for junior football. Wouldn’t you know it, he tore his ACL on the first day of practice? Are fat kids more likely to get injured than skinny dudes? I thought he would be protected by all that weight. Now I’m feeling guilty. Help me out here.

Sometimes it seems like children are made of rubber. They fall or they injure themselves in some way but they get up and bounce back as if nothing ever happened. But in reality, that’s not always the case. And with more children and teens participating in sports activities, there has been a rise in the number of musculoskeletal injuries in this age group.

One of those injuries is what your son experienced — a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The ACL is one of two ligaments that criss-cross inside the knee to give it stability. The ACL helps the knee bear the weight or load of our body while we move, twist, jump and turn.

A recent review of medical records for 371 pediatric patients who had surgery to reconstruct a torn ACL showed that being overweight is a risk factor for injury. And not just the primary (main) ACL injury, but also damage to the meniscus and chondral (cartilage) surface of the joint.

This type of study has been done in adults and found that the longer the patient waits between ACL injury and surgery, the greater the risk of meniscal and chondral damage. And that can mean damage that can’t be repaired and that leads to arthritis and loss of knee function in time. A study like this could potentially save children from the same fate. And this is the first study this large to really help answer some of these questions.

They found three factors that increase the risk of poor outcomes and degenerative changes in the knee. The first was a time delay between when the injury happened and when treatment was received. Children who had surgery in the first 150 days (five months) had fewer meniscal tears compared with children whose surgery took place later.

And as we already mentioned, obese children putting greater load on the damaged tissue were more likely to experience additional injury to the meniscus and chondral surface of the joint. In all children, the presence of a meniscal tear also increased the risk of further chondral damage. Pediatric patients older than 15 years had a higher rate of meniscal tears.

You are right to be concerned about your son’s excess weight. Obesity is becoming a major public health problem in all ages — including our youngsters. Exercise is essential in preventing early-onset of diabetes and later problems such as heart disease. Obese individuals (children and adults) are at increased risk for musculoskeletal injuries. Such physical injuries can have a lifelong impact.

When your son recovers from this episode, perhaps swimming, biking, or some other noncontact sport might be a helpful way to lose weight without serious injury.

I am 12 years old and in love with horses. Someday I’m going to own a horse farm. Right now I have two horses I take care of for someone else. They let me ride them anytime I want. The question I have is about my knee. I tore my ACL in gymnastics. I’ve been told to stay off it until they decide whether or not I should have surgery. Can I still ride during this time? And how will they know if I need surgery?

You should really ask your doctor these two questions. And you don’t necessarily have to go back for another appointment before discussing these important issues. You can call the physician’s office and ask to speak to the doctor’s nurse or assistant. Tell that person you would like to speak to the doctor and explain why. You will find most medical staff very willing to answer patient’s questions and help guide you through the process.

The decision to have surgery or try conservative care first (usually medications and physical therapy) is based on many factors. Your age, weight, and presence of other health problems (like diabetes) are important.

The surgeon usually checks carefully for any sign of other injury to the knee. It’s not uncommon for the force of an injury that is strong enough to tear the ACL to also be strong enough to damage the meniscus (knee cartilage) or the cartilage that lines the joint (referred to as chondral tissue). If that’s the case, then surgery is considered sooner or later.

It is important to prevent additional injury to the knee. An unrepaired, damaged joint can eventually develop painful arthritis. And at an early age at the time of injury, that could happen long before you become the age of a grandmother.

So, whatever your physician advises you, we would strongly encourage you to follow carefully. A little time at this end protecting the joint (which may mean not riding for awhile) will pay off in the end. And being a horse lover myself, I know there’s plenty to do for and with them everyday that doesn’t involve riding. So you don’t have to give up everything all at once or forever!

Can you tell me the difference between stable and unstable SCFE? My sister’s son has had this condition for a few years and they just told me it went from stable to unstable. What does that mean (literally) and what will it mean for my nephew (the boy with the problem)?

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), it is a condition that affects the hip in teenagers between the ages of 12 and 16 most often. Cases have been reported as early as age nine years old. In this condition, the growth center of the hip (the capital femoral epiphysis) actually slips backwards on the top of the femur (the thigh bone).

Stable SCFE means the child can put weight on the leg and walk (with or without crutches). Unstable SCFE is defined by the child’s inability to walk with or without crutches due to severe pain. Surgery is usually necessary to stabilize the hip and prevent the situation from getting worse.

If untreated this can lead to serious problems in the hip joint later in life. Fortunately, the condition can be treated and the complications avoided or reduced if recognized early.
The primary goal of the treatment of SCFE is to stop any further slippage of the capital femoral epiphysis. The less slip, the lower the risk of problems in the hip during the child’s life.

Once the epiphysis has closed, slippage will stop. Epiphysis closure occurs when the two areas of bone–the epiphysis and metaphysis–join, or fuse, into one single bone. At that point there is no cartilage growth plate remaining between the two parts of the femur. Surgery usually speeds up the process of epiphysis closure.

When a child has been diagnosed with SCFE, surgery is usually suggested immediately. It’s not clear from your question if your nephew has already had one surgical procedure and then developed an unstable hip. Or if his condition went from stable to unstable before surgery was done.

In either case, the preferred method for stopping the epiphysis from slipping further is to place a large screw into the epiphysis to hold it in place. This screw is placed using a special X-ray machine called a fluoroscope. The fluoroscope allows the surgeon to see an X-ray image on a TV monitor while doing the surgery. In this way, the surgeon is able to accurately place a screw into the epiphysis using a small incision in the side of the thigh.

If there is a serious structural change in the anatomy of the hip, there may need to be further surgery to restore the alignment closer to normal. This procedure is usually not considered until the child is done growing. As a child grows, there will be some remodeling that occurs in the hip joint. This may improve the situation such that further surgery is unnecessary.

My daughter and son-in-law are Americans but they live in Europe. Their son (my grandson, obviously) is having surgery for a hip problem called slipped capital. It sounds gruesome. They are going to dislocate the hip in order to put it back together again. Is this the way it would be done in the U.S.? Maybe they should come home for this surgery. What do you recommend?

You are asking a very good question and one that doesn’t have a very good answer just yet. Here are a few details that might help you understand the problem. The condition, called slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) affects the hip in teenagers between the ages of 12 and 16 most often. Cases have been reported as early as age nine years old. In this condition, the growth center of the hip (the capital femoral epiphysis) actually slips backwards on the top of the femur (the thigh bone).

If untreated this can lead to serious problems in the hip joint later in life. Fortunately, the condition can be treated and the complications avoided or reduced if recognized early. But what is the best treatment for this problem? And what evidence do we have to support treatment as “best”? That is the topic of a recent literature review from two orthopedic surgeons (one from the University of Iowa and another from the University of Indiana).

The goals of treatment are to 1) keep the problem from getting worse, 2) avoid complications, 3) improve hip motion, and 4) delay or prevent the development of degenerative hip disease. With that many different kinds of goals, you can imagine treatment may be varied (different for each child).

One approach is to provide treatment based on whether the condition is stable or unstable. Stable SCFE means the child can put weight on the leg and walk (with or without crutches). Unstable SCFE is defined by the child’s inability to walk with or without crutches due to severe pain. Surgery is usually necessary to stabilize the hip and prevent the situation from getting worse.

In this study, current best evidence is reported on treatment for stable versus unstable SCFE and treatment involving surgical dislocation. There are easily a half dozen ways to treat a stable SCFE. But the consensus is that the best way to treat stable SCFE is with a single, large screw into the epiphysis to hold it in place.

The best treatment for unstable SCFE isn’t as clear. In fact, the treatment for this type of SCFE is quite controversial. The risk of avascular necrosis (AVN; loss of blood to the hip with death of the bone) must be taken into consideration. This complication is the number one reason why patients with SCFE end up with a total hip replacement.

The timing of surgical treatment for unstable SCFE is also hotly debated among and between surgeons from the U.S. and Europe. The risk of necrosis is one reason why some surgeons insist on early treatment. But others think that surgical stabilization can lead to avascular necrosis. Right now, the best evidence suggests that the need for surgery is “urgent” in children with unstable SCFE. This approach has the lowest rates of necrosis.

Then the final decision is whether or not to dislocate the hip during surgery. Hip dislocation is done in order to better realign the epiphysis and therefore improve hip function. But there is concern that surgical dislocation can also increase the rate of avascular necrosis. Surgeons must also weigh other risks that come with surgical dislocation such as damage to the hip cartilage, labrum, joint surface, and/or bone.

According to this review, there is no evidence to support the more aggressive approach of surgical dislocation and epiphyseal realignment for stable SCFE. The single screw fixation method should remain the treatment of choice for these patients. As for surgical dislocation to treat unstable SCFE — caution is advised. This is a newer treatment method that hasn’t stood the test of time. There aren’t enough studies to report on long-term results. For now (and until better evidence is available), gentle surgical reduction with internal fixation is advised.

Our 14-year-old granddaughter has juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Her left hip is frozen now so they are talking about doing a hip replacement. What should we know about this? We are trying to gather as much information as possible.

Age 55 used to be considered “too young” for a total hip replacement. Concerns about how long the implant would last, bone loss with future surgeries, and a high rate of complications often meant patients in pain just had to tough it out and wait. Now patients as young as 14 years old are having hip replacement surgery. There are many challenges and complexities involved with total hip replacement in young patients but the results seem to be well worth it.

Most of these surgeries are being done for young adults who have severe hip damage or deformity. Such significant changes to the hip are mostly caused by osteonecrosis (bone death), osteoarthritis (usually the result of a previous injury), or juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. The goals of surgery are to relieve pain, improve motion, and restore function.

One of the reasons total hip replacements are now possible in young adults has been the switch from cemented to noncemented implant (called component) parts. Cementless cups and heads means less bone is lost when removing the implants if and when they need to be redone after 10 or 15 years. Bone loss often means leg length shortening so this feature helps reduce leg length differences, too.

A second reason results are better these days making earlier hip replacement possible is the advancement of surgical techniques. Minimally invasive approaches, muscle preservation, imaging studies to help identify structural deformities also help produce improved outcomes.

If your granddaughter has had previous surgeries there can be scar tissue to deal with and the presence of other hardware (pins, screws, metal plates). You mentioned the presence of severe muscle and joint contractures (stiffness) as the reason for the hip replacement so we know that is a factor. Careful evaluation and pre-operative planning is advised (more than is needed for older adults who just have degenerative osteoarthritic joint changes).

The surgeon must choose the best approach and implant possible for each patient. Sometimes this decision requires special imaging studies. Magnified X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans give the surgeon a three-dimensional (3-D) understanding of the joint angles, deformities, bone condition, and bone/joint size. Special thought and care goes into removal of previously used hardware before implanting the new hip joint.

Patients can expect some bumps along the road due to the possibility of complications, which still remain high in many cases. But with today’s more modern approaches, results are excellent.

My uncle just had his foot amputated from a condition he has had all his life called “clubfoot.” I am pregnant with my first child and thinking of all the family possibilities of things that can go wrong. Clubfoot is one of them. Is this hereditary and do they cut the foot off right away so the child doesn’t have to suffer like my uncle did his entire life?

Clubfoot also known as Congenital Talipes Equinovarus describes a position of the foot a baby is born with. The foot is turned under and towards the other foot. When broken down into its parts, equinovarus means that the toes are pointed down (equinus) with the ankle flexed forward (like the position of the foot when a ballet dancer is on her toes). Varus means tilted inward. The ankle is in varus when you try to put the soles of your feet together.

This twisted position of the foot causes problems. The ligaments between the bones are contracted, or shortened. The joints between the tarsal bones do not move as they should. The bones themselves are deformed. This results in a very tight, stiff foot that cannot be placed flat on the ground for walking. To walk, the child must walk on the outside edge of the foot rather than on the sole of the foot.

Until recently, most experts believed that the deformity was due to the foot being stuck in the wrong position in the womb. As development progressed, the foot could not grow normally because it was turned under and held in that position. Today, most information suggests that clubfoot is hereditary, meaning that it runs in families. It is not clear what genetic defect causes the problem. But just because your uncle has this condition is not a guarantee that your baby will have it, too.

The successful treatment of clubfoot today relies on a noninvasive method named for the surgeon who developed it: the Ponseti Method. This type of treatment is started as soon as possible. The foot is manipulated (moved) to stretch and loosen the tight structures. The foot is then placed in a cast to hold it in a corrected position. This is repeated every one or two weeks until the deformity is corrected or surgery is performed.

Sometimes a minor surgical procedure is required to lengthen the heel cord (fascia or connective tissue that connects the calf muscle to the heel bone). After casting is completed, the child wears a brace for several years. In the end, the results are excellent and amputation is not required. This treatment is a definite shift in how clubfoot is handled compared with when your uncle was a child.

My wife gave birth to our first child last night. I’m exhausted and I’m sure she is but we need some information right away. The baby is perfect but he does have a foot deformity on both sides they are calling “clubfoot.” What is the treatment for this problem and how soon should be take him to see a specialist?

Clubfoot is not a rare or new condition. This condition has been described in medical literature since the ancient Egyptians. It is a congenital problem, which means the condition is present at birth and occurred during fetal development. The condition affects both feet in about half of the infants born with clubfoot. Clubfoot affects twice as many males as females.

Clubfoot is a term that describes the position of the foot your baby was born with. The foot is turned under and towards the other foot. The medical term for this problem is equinovarus. When broken down into its parts, equinovarus means that the toes are pointed down (equinus) with the ankle flexed forward (like the position of the foot when a ballet dancer is on her toes). Varus means tilted inward. The ankle is in varus when you try to put the soles of your feet together.

This twisted position of the foot causes problems. The ligaments between the bones are contracted, or shortened. The joints between the tarsal bones do not move as they should. The bones themselves are deformed. This results in a very tight, stiff foot that cannot be placed flat on the ground for walking. To walk, the child must walk on the outside edge of the foot rather than on the sole of the foot.

Fortunately, treatment is quite successful using a method developed by Dr. Ponseti. This type of treatment is started as soon as possible (usually within the first week after birth). The foot is manipulated (moved) to stretch and loosen the tight structures. The foot is then placed in a cast to hold it in a corrected position. This is repeated every one or two weeks until the deformity is corrected.

Your pediatrician will guide you through this process. You will be referred to an orthopedic surgeon immediately — often while the baby is still in the hospital. Treatment may even begin before you take the baby home but if not, then within the first week. If this is not what happens where you are, then seek the services of an orthopedic surgeon who has experience with the Ponseti method. Studies show excellent long-term results with this treatment.

I don’t think children have any business riding solo on ATVs. I’m not sure they should even be riding with someone else. I just see this as an accident looking for a place to happen. Am I being an alarmist here or is this really something to be concerned about?

You are not alone in your concerns. Orthopedic surgeons treating these injuries have expressed concern publicly. Even so, the number of ATV sales has continued to rise and along with it the number of children and teens riding these vehicles. Not only that, but the vehicles have become heavier, larger, and faster. Roll-over accidents resulting in spine injuries increased by 476 per cent between 1997 and 2006.

Children are more likely than adults to be injured in an ATV accident for several reasons. Of course, they are usually smaller in size compared with adults. They are no match for a 500 pound (half ton) machine. In this study, only 14 per cent of the group was wearing a helmet. This is typical of what has been reported in other similar studies as well.

Children and younger teens have less muscle strength compared with adults. Other factors include decreased depth perception, level of emotional maturity and cognitive ability, and experience. Females are more likely to experience a spine injury due to a phenomenon referred to as vehicle-rider mismatch. They are simply outweighed by these machines and have more trouble correcting or preventing accidents, especially rollovers.

Older teens were more likely to have spine injuries. This may be explained by the fact that they have reached full growth (skeletal maturity) and have less flexible bone structures. Their spines are more adult-like with less ligamentous laxity (looseness) and more upright (vertical) positioning of the spinal (facet) joints.

The authors of a recent study on ATV-related injuries in children from the University of Tennessee concluded that ATV-related injuries are high-energy resulting in multiple (and often very serious) injuries. Almost half of the children involved were younger than 16 and were not wearing a helmet. Surgery was required for more than half the group at a cost of nearly $75,000 per patient!

Your concerns are well-founded. These facts suggest the need for more education and legislative efforts to change this pattern of behavior.

Our grandchildren have just been given an ATV for their birthday (to share). I can’t begin to tell you how concerned I am about a big machine like that for these two little girls. They are 12 and 13 years old. What can I say to their parents to stress the potential harm this “gift” could do?

It is a fact that thousands of children are being seriously injured in all-terrain vehicle (ATV) accidents every year. The number of accidents and injuries has doubled in the last 10 years. Children are less likely to be riding ATVs compared with adults but they make up a full one-third of all injuries. And some of those accidents result in death.

Orthopedic surgeons treating these injuries have expressed concern publicly. Even so, the number of ATV sales has continued to rise and along with it the number of children and teens riding these vehicles. Not only that, but the vehicles have become heavier, larger, and faster. Roll-over accidents resulting in spine injuries increased by 476 per cent between 1997 and 2006.

In a recent study from the University of Tennessee, surgeons compiled information from their records to get an idea of how many and what kind of ATV-related injuries are being treated at their clinic. They divided them up by age (birth to 15 years and 16 to 18 years) and by type of injury (head/skull, trunk/abdomen, nonspinal orthopedic).

Some children had more than one type of injury including spine and nonspinal locations. Most of the spine injuries were single level injuries. In a smaller number of children, multiple spine injuries (fractures, spinal cord injuries, nerve root injuries) were recorded. More than half the children in the study required surgery.

Children are more likely than adults to be injured in an ATV accident for several reasons. Of course, they are usually smaller in size compared with adults. They are no match for a 500 pound (half ton) machine. In this study, only 14 per cent of the group was wearing a helmet. This is typical of what has been reported in other similar studies as well.

Children and younger teens have less muscle strength compared with adults. Other factors include decreased depth perception, level of emotional maturity and cognitive ability, and experience. Females are more likely to experience a spine injury due to a phenomenon referred to as vehicle-rider mismatch. They are simply outweighed by these machines and have more trouble correcting or preventing accidents, especially rollovers.

Why can’t children with a broken femur be put in a single leg cast? Why is this bulky, heavy double-leg cast necessary?

There are different treatment methods used for femur (thigh bone) fractures depending on the child’s age, location and severity of the fracture, need for traction or surgery, and so on.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has recommended the use of the double-leg cast called a spica cast for diaphyseal (shaft or long part of the bone) fracture of the femur. To prevent movement and allow the bone to heal, the spica cast is used most often. This type of cast starts at the waist and goes all the way down to the toes.

A single leg cast can be used in some situation. This type of cast ends above the hip on the uninjured side and leaves the uninjured leg free to move. The double leg cast immobilizes the injured leg from waist to toes and covers the other hip down to just above the knee. By anchoring both hips and thighs, better control over the fracture site is possible.

The ages of children who would benefit most from spica cast treatment for are between six months and five years old. This approach is actually referred to as “best practice” medicine based on available evidence. Cast immobilization avoids surgery with anesthesia, scarring, and the possibility of complications.

Surgeons recognize that even casting has its downside. Skin problems can develop under the cast. Too much pressure can cause swelling causing a compartment syndrome. And, of course, caring for a child in such a bulky cast is no easy task. Transporting the child in the car seat or car, toileting, and lifting and carrying the child are some of the challenges the family members or caretakers face.

Children with shortening of the bone due to the fracture will require reduction
(restoring the length of the bone) before casting. More than 25 mm of shortening should not be put in a cast until reduction has been done. Surgeons evaluate each individual child when making the decision about treatment. You can certainly bring this question up next time you see the surgeon and find out why the double-leg cast was required. There is likely one or more reasons why this was the recommended treatment.

Our son is being evaluated in the ER for a broken leg — snapped the middle of the thigh bone in two. He’s in kindergarten half-days. Will this keep him from going to school? We both work and don’t have time off for an extended period of time. I’m pretty worried about how we are going to manage.

Young children with a fractured femur (thigh bone) can be treated in a number of different ways. Most involve casting of some sort. To prevent movement and allow the bone to heal, a spica cast is used most often. This type of cast starts at the waist and goes all the way down to the toes.

The spica cast may be single leg or double-leg. The single leg cast ends above the hip on the uninjured side. This type of cast leaves the uninjured leg free to move. The double leg cast immobilizes the injured leg from waist to toes and covers the other hip down to just above the knee. Not being able to bend at the hips (and knee) for four to six weeks presents some difficulties for families caring for young children.

Treatment of femoral fractures like the kind you described is with spica casting. This is considered “best practice” based on recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS). Cast immobilization avoids surgery with anesthesia, scarring, and the possibility of complications.

Surgeons recognize that casting has its downsides. Caring for a child in such a bulky cast is no easy task. Transporting the child in the car seat or car, toileting, and lifting and carrying the child are some of the challenges the family members or caretakers face.

But the good news is that a single-leg spica cast is possible for some children with this type of injury. They must not have more than a 25 mm shortening of the bone or surgery to pin or plate the bone. A recent study from The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland reported on the benefits of a single-leg spica cast. They said their patients’ parents and care givers reported taking fewer days off from work to care for the child.

The single leg cast could also be molded with enough hip and knee flexion (bend) to allow the child to sit in a special car seat. And the children with single-leg spica casts could sit in chairs more comfortably. Children in this type of cast could even walk a little bit. Attendance at school should be possible but your surgeon will advise you according to what your child needs. You may want to let the school know of any special needs your child will have during this time of immobility.

I need a quick tutorial on elbow fractures of the part of the elbow next to the body. My nephew is here visiting us for the summer and that’s what the emergency room doctor told us he’s got. First day here and wouldn’t you know? He’ll be in a cast evidently. I’ll have to explain all this to his mother (my sister). Help!

Falls and throwing injuries are the two most common causes of medial epicondyle (elbow) fractures in children and teens between the ages of seven and 15. The medial epicondyle is located on the inside of the elbow. It is the place where several muscles and ligaments of the forearm attach (flexor muscles, pronator teres, medial collateral ligament).

The mechanism of injury is usually a valgus force on the elbow strong enough to pull these muscles and ligament off the bone taking with it a piece of bone. A valgus force goes from the lateral or outside edge of the elbow to the medial or inside of the elbow. This type of injury with a bone fragment attached to soft tissue is referred to as an avulsion fracture.

The child may feel or hear a popping sensation at the time of the injury. This will be followed by pain. Elbow dislocation is common and nerve damage is seen in up to 15 per cent of all patients with this type of fracture.

The goal of treatment is to heal the fracture, of course, but also to help the child regain normal motion, strength, and function. In the case of an athlete, return-to-sport and play at a preinjury level is ideal. The surgeon will use X-rays to guide the initial treatment decision.

Some children will be able to be treated with a conservative course of care (no surgery required). It sounds like this describes your nephew’s situation. If there are no complicating factors, he will likely be in the cast for four to six weeks. Reported results are usually quite excellent.

He will have to keep the cast dry, which limits water activities. In some situations (e.g., showering, possibly boating) a plastic bag can be taped around the arm to keep it dry. The hospital staff will give you a sheet of instructions. Follow those closely and report any new or unusual symptoms that might develop (hand swelling, finger numbness and tingling, cold fingers).

What do you think about the practice of swaddling babies? I work in a NICU and we have fierce and long debates about this among ourselves and with the docs. We are pretty much evenly split between those who think it’s a good idea and those who don’t.

Many cultures have practiced swaddling their babies. Native Americans used a cradleboard or “papoose” carrier. More modern use of this positioning relies on a blanket or diapers. The child is placed in a straight position with arms and legs held to the sides. The effect is to create neutral warmth, which is calming to the nervous system. There is evidence to support the idea that babies sleep better and cry less in swaddles. There is also evidence of decreased risk of sudden infant child syndrome (SIDS) for babies who are swaddled.

But the question has been raised about the potential harm this positioning may have on the hips. A straight position held too long can lead to hip subluxation (partial dislocation) or even full dislocation. Children’s hips need the opportunity to move in all directions, especially hip abduction (away from the body) in order to fully form a deep, stable hip socket.

In order to study the effect of swaddling, researchers from China swaddled baby rats. Studying this problem in humans would not be considered ethical so animal studies are the next best way to investigate potential harm to humans. They used four groups of rats.

One group (control group) was not swaddled at all. The other three groups were swaddled for varying lengths of time using surgical tape to hold the hind legs together against the body. Group two (early swaddling) was held in the swaddling position immediately after birth and for the first five days of life. Group three was swaddled for the second five days. Group four was swaddled early (first five days) and for a prolonged or extended period of time (total of 10 days).

The rats were allowed to return to normal movements for three months and then the hips were X-rayed and examined with dissection. They found that the rats who were swaddled the earliest and longest had more cases of small, deformed femoral heads (round bone at the top of the thigh bone that fits into the hip socket). This group was also most likely to have hip subluxations and/or dislocations. And the cartilage growth that forms the hip socket was deformed or distorted.

At the other end of the continuum, the control group had perfectly formed hips with no problems of any kind. In the two remaining groups, the early swaddling group had the worst results with more hip dysplasia (shallow hip sockets), more subluxations, and more dislocations compared with the late swaddling group. Female rats were more likely to have hip problems in general but especially in the early swaddling group.

The value of this study is to help prevent developmental dysplasia from forming in human babies. The authors suggest that the practice of swaddling should be avoided in humans because of the potential negative effect on hip development. It is important to find other ways to achieve the same benefits of swaddling without binding the hips/legs.

The authors were unable to explain why some hips subluxed or dislocated while others did not. Further studies are needed to examine some of the reasons why some rats developed problems and others didn’t. There may be a way to predict which babies can be swaddled safely and those who must rely on other means of calming and relaxation.

Our god child was just diagnosed with hip dysplasia but only in the left hip. They told us at the clinic where he as examined that the left side is affected most often when this problem occurs. Can you tell us why that is?

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) develops either in utero (in the uterus) or during the first year of life. It may or may not be present at birth. In this condition there is a disruption in the normal relationship between the head of the femur (thigh bone) and the acetabulum (hip socket).

DDH can be mild to severe. In mild cases called unstable hip dysplasia, the hip is in the joint but easily dislocated. More involved cases are partially dislocated or completely dislocated. A partial dislocation is called subluxation. DDH can affect one or both hips but you are right that the left hip is affected more often.

The reason for this may be the position of the child while in the mother’s uterus. Ultrasound images show a tendency for babies’ left hips to be pressed up against the mother’s sacrum. This effect could contribute to the greater number of cases of left hip dysplasia in infants.

I can’t seem to get a straight answer about my son’s knee problem. He has osteochondritis dissecans. We’ve taken him to three different “experts.” They all say the same thing: there isn’t enough ‘evidence’ to say for sure this way or that way is the best treatment. As a parent, I find that extremely frustrating. I need some answers. What can you tell me?

There is a recent summary of current treatment recommendations put out by members of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The summary provides a 16-point clinical practice guideline for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). Although OCD can affect several areas of the body (ankle, elbow, knee), this review is strictly limited to the diagnosis and treatment of the knee.

The guidelines are meant to inform physicians and surgeons of the best practice recommended for this condition. The idea is to present what the evidence shows from studies so far that can aid them in helping patients obtain the best results possible. The problem is that so much of the evidence is weak or inconclusive. Where there is agreement (called consensus), it is usually based on expert opinion not necessarily hard evidence.

We can give you a brief summary of the current treatment guidelines. You can read the full, detailed summary (with explanations) at: http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/OCD_guideline.pdf. The committee was unable to recommend for or against nonoperative care for children with OCD that does not cause pain or other symptoms. Likewise, the committee was unable to recommend for or against surgical drilling in patients with symptoms after nonoperative care but with a stable lesion.

Other areas where the research remains inconclusive include: 1) whether or not to take X-rays of the other knee once OCD has been discovered, 2) which type of cartilage repair works best when surgery is needed, 3) whether to treat patient with or without symptoms who are fully grown (skeletally mature) in a similar fashion, and 4) whether or not patients should have repeat or follow-up MRIs when they are skeletally mature without symptoms.

There are some areas where the committee could offer guidelines based on agreement (referred to as consensus). Consensus means the committee agrees on the recommendation even though there isn’t enough reliable evidence to prove the guideline is accurate. For example, most experts agree that skeletally immature patients should be offered surgical correction when the lesion is unstable or shifted but still salvageable.

Likewise, the committee agreed that symptomatic patients who are skeletally mature should be offered surgery when the lesion is unstable or displaced. After surgery, all patients should be provided with physical therapy. X-rays and/or MRIs should be taken to assess healing after treatment, especially for those who are still experiencing painful symptoms.

The lack of strong, conclusive evidence shows us the need for better designed (and more) studies in this area of medicine. Even with the current evidence and recommendations, each patient must be evaluated and treated on an individual basis. Decisions made about management and treatment techniques to use are determined by the patient in consultation with the physician.

Our 16-year-old son went through all the treatment for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee and still has too much pain to my way of thinking. The surgeon wants to do another series of X-rays and MRIs to see what’s going on. It feels like we are starting from scratch. Will this really help?

When osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) affects the knee, it’s mostly at the end of the big bone of the thigh (an area called the femoral condyles. A joint surface damaged by OCD doesn’t heal naturally. Even with surgery, OCD can lead to future joint problems, including degenerative arthritis and osteoarthritis.

That’s why the care and management of this problem are important. Getting the best results possible may help prevent problems later. The problem occurs where the cartilage of the knee attaches to the bone underneath. The area of bone just under the cartilage surface is injured, leading to damage to the blood vessels of the bone. Without blood flow, the area of damaged bone actually dies. This area of dead bone can be seen on an X-ray and is sometimes referred to as the osteochondritis lesion.

The lesions usually occur in the part of the joint that holds most of the body’s weight. This means that the problem area is under constant stress and doesn’t get time to heal. It also means that the lesions cause pain and problems when walking and putting weight on the knee. It is more common for the lesions to occur on the medial femoral condyle, because the inside of the knee bears more weight.

Nonsurgical treatments help in about half the cases of OCD affecting children (called juvenile OCD or JOCD). The goal is to help the lesions heal before growth stops in the thighbone. Even if imaging tests show that growth has already stopped, it is usually worth trying nonsurgical treatments. When these treatments work, the knee seems as good as new, and the JOCD doesn’t seem to lead to arthritis.

Some patients who are too near the end of bone growth may not benefit with nonsurgical treatment. Surgery may also be advised if and when the lesion becomes totally or partially detached. There are several ways to fix it in place. In some cases, the loose fragment will just have to be removed.

Repeat imaging studies help surgeons see where the lesion is and how deep, large, or severe it may be. This information can be extremely valuable in planning the next step in treatment. Although there isn’t enough reliable evidence to support this practice, experts who treat OCD agree that serial X-rays and/or MRIs to assess healing are advised for patients who still have symptoms even after the first round of treatments.

Our 13-year-old son fell while playing in a soccer tournament and busted up his thigh. He had to have surgery and two long, thin rods put down the inside of the bone. Now that we are four weeks into it, it occurred to me to ask what his chances are for a full recovery. Will he be able to walk without a limp? Play soccer at his usual full-speed-ahead approach?

The prognosis for healing of femoral fractures in children is extemely good. At his age, he most likely has not completed full (skeletal) growth or maturity. That’s to his advantage in terms of healing capacity. There are some other variables that may influence the final outcome.

For example, children who have severe fractures (especially if they are large children) may face some challenges other might not. The force and load of the leg itself and the body weight can limit some of the types of treatments available to smaller individuals.

Instead of a flexible rod placed down inside the bone, a rigid locked intramedullary nails often used for adults may be selected for older children/teens or heavier children. They are also the best choice when the fracture site is broken into many little pieces of bone or unstable for any other reason. This type of fixation does not have to be removed so that’s an advantage.

During the healing process the concern is for a nice union of the bone ends or fragments without rotation of the bone, loss of bone length, or evidence of growth disturbance. Barring any unforseen problems your son will probably be back on his feet with full weight-bearing seven or eight weeks after the surgery. It may take another four to six weeks to regain full strength and mobility. Unless the surgeon has suggested some reason why he might not resume sports with full participation, he should expect to be back in full action by next season.

Thank goodness for smart phones! I could make a commercial with all the ways this thing has helped me. And now I’m checking with you about surgery for a medial epicondyle fracture that is “displaced.” I wrote down what the surgeon told us so I could ask you right away what will be done and what to expect. The patient is a child (my stepson) who is 12.

Falls and throwing injuries are the two most common causes of medial epicondyle (elbow) fractures in children and teens between the ages of seven and 15. The medial epicondyle is located on the inside of the elbow. It is the place where several muscles and ligaments of the forearm attach (flexor muscles, pronator teres, medial collateral ligament). The mechanism of injury is usually a valgus force on the elbow strong enough to pull these muscles and ligament off the bone taking with it a piece of bone.

A valgus force goes from the lateral or outside edge of the elbow to the medial or inside of the elbow. This type of injury with a bone fragment attached to soft tissue is referred to as an avulsion fracture. The child may feel or hear a popping sensation at the time of the injury. This will be followed by pain. Elbow dislocation is common and nerve damage is seen in up to 15 per cent of all patients with this type of fracture.

The goal of treatment is to heal the fracture, of course, but also to help the child regain normal motion, strength, and function. In the case of an athlete, return-to-sport and play at a preinjury level is ideal. The surgeon will use X-rays to guide the initial treatment decision.

Some children will be able to be treated with a conservative course of care (no surgery required). The selection of nonoperative versus operative care hinges on whether or not the fracture is displaced (separated) and by how much.

Surgery is required for open fractures (through the skin), fracture-dislocations, and unstable fractures (often those that go through the joint surface). Any sign of nerve or blood vessel damage must also be addressed surgically and quickly. One other reason why surgery might be needed is if the bones have separated apart (called displacement). But there’s no cut off point between when surgery is needed and when it’s not. What one surgeon may consider a “significant” amount of displacement may be not the same for another.

Age and size of the bone fracture fragment help guide the surgeon choose the best surgical treatment approach. Younger children are treated with bone fixation using wires. Older children and teens are more likely to be able to handle having a screw put in place to hold the fracture until healing takes place. Pins (rather than screws or wires) are used when there are small bone fragments.

Many studies report the good success of treatment when following these guidelines for both conservative care and operative treatment. Loss of elbow extension (ability to straighten the elbow) is the number one limitation after this surgery. Starting elbow and arm movement right away after the cast comes off is the best way to deal with this problem.

There are some areas where further studies would help clear up a few questions. For example, just how much displacement is an indicator that surgery is needed? Do children get back to their beloved sports activity faster when treated with surgery instead of the immobilization used during nonoperative care. Does the high level of play and intensity of activity suggest fixation should be considered more often than not?

It’s easy to see that a severe fracture and unstable elbow requires surgery. The cases that fall in between are the ones that require individual consideration of all factors. The surgeon’s own experience and expertise certainly fall into that category. Patient age, activity level, X-ray findings, and patient goals are additional factors.

Do you think it’s the right thing to do surgery after casting a leg for four weeks? Our nine-year-old son got tackled from the left while playing football. They weren’t sure if he had a fracture of the growth plate so they put him in a cast. Four weeks later, now they say he has a problem that requires surgery. I’m like ‘whoa’ — first there’s almost nothing there, now we need surgery?

Any fracture affecting the growth plate of bones in children can result in stopping growth. Disturbance of growth after fracture of the distal femur (bottom end of the thigh bone just above the knee) is a particularly vexing problem. That’s because this is where the fastest growth plate in the body is located. Young children can experience as much as a three-inch difference in leg length from a fracture of this type.

Assessment isn’t always easy. There can be more damage present than is visible with standard X-rays. If the radiologist sees a slight fleck of bone next to the growth plate or a little bit of widening or other irregularity of the growth plate, a CT scan may be ordered. As a precaution, any suspicion of growth plate disruption is treated with a full leg cast (up to the groin) for four weeks. Obese or young patients may need a full hip-to-foot (spica) cast to hold the leg still during the healing phase.

Growth plate fractures are diagnosed and classified using a standard model called the Salter-Harris (SH) classification. Fractures in this area are divided into four groups (SH I, II, III, and IV) depending on severity. Severity is determined by the number of bone fragments, presence of displacement (separation), and size of displacement.

As you might imagine, more severe fractures (SH III and IV) are the most likely to develop growth arrest, arthritis, and other complications. Surgery is advised whenever the fracture is displaced. For a child who was put in a cast now needing surgery, there must be a reason for this decision. Has the fracture separated or failed to heal? Perhaps the bone is healing with poor alignment putting your child at increased risk for posttraumatic arthritis.

The procedure may be needed to put any pieces of nonhealing or poorly aligned bone back in place. Everything will be held together with wires, pins, or screws until healing has occurred. Wires are used for small fragments. Pins and screws are used for large bone fragments. The surgeon can place the hardware through the growth plate but must try and avoid going through the knee joint itself. The child is then put back in a cast for at least a month (up to six weeks).

With this information in mind, you should be able to ask the surgeon to explain (maybe for a second time — that’s okay, too) the need for a change in treatment from nonoperative to operative care. Don’t hesitate to ask additional questions until you understand fully what’s going on and why.