I saw a report on shoulder repairs comparing two different ways of doing the operation. One way was more successful than the other. How do they know the success wasn't due to something else like the patient's cooperation or the rehab program afterwards? When I had shoulder surgery I noticed a lot of difference from patient to patient but I thought it was because some did their exercises and some didn't.
You've asked a good question. Sometimes researchers can pinpoint one or two factors that clearly make a difference. Special math formulas are used to analyze the data. Statistical analysis helps sort out some of these things.
In other cases, it's not always clear how the results were affected by surgery versus something else like rehab. If the study doesn't evaluate other factors there may be no way of knowing.
Many researchers report the limitations they see in their own studies. They may point out areas that weren't studied or weaknesses in the way the study was done. You may have hit on one of the key differences from study to study.
« Back
All content provided by eOrthopod® is a registered trademark of Mosaic Medical Group, L.L.C.. Content is the sole property of Mosaic Medical Group, LLC and used herein by permission. Alteration of these documents in any way is a violation of the copyright.