You may be referring to a form of therapy that causes oscillating or vibrational pressure at low frequencies to the muscles on either side of the spine. The type of shock therapy to the brain is something different altogether. Shock wave therapy for the back/spine is also called vibrotherapy. This is a technique used more often outside the United States.
In the United States, you are more likely to find ultrasound (another form of vibrational frequencies using sound waves) in use. The intention behind both of these vibrational therapies is to increase blood circulation, improve soft tissue stretch, reduce pain and stiffness, and speed up healing. Other potential effects of shock wave and ultrasound therapy may include enhanced cellular metabolism, muscle relaxation, and increased trunk/spinal motion.
But before you get too excited about this as a potential new and improved treatment, you should be aware of a recent report from Spain. Researchers from Spain take a look at the effectiveness of shock wave therapy and ultrasound in the treatment of both acute and chronic back pain.
They conducted the study as a systematic review. This means they searched all the currently published literature looking for studies on either of these two treatment methods. They found a total of 13 studies but only four randomly controlled trials.
The reported results then are based on the experiences of 252 patients. Various treatment methods were used and compared with ultrasound and shock wave therapy such as lumbar traction, low power laser, electrical stimulation, and spinal manipulation. Here’s a summary of the results:
This review was an important publication because ultrasound is still a common modality used in the treatment of back pain. Primary care physicians and chiropractors recommend its use. Physical therapists around the world still use it despite all the evidence (including the results of this study) that show it is not effective.
The authors of this systematic review repeat what has said before. Not only should shock wave therapy and ultrasound NOT be used to treat low back pain (acute, chronic, with or without leg pain) but studies using these modalities should not continue to be funded. With over 200 different treatments currently available, it would make more sense to find successful treatments that are also cost-effective. Future studies should be focused in this direction rather than re-studying something that has been disproven so thoroughly.