In this article, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) presents a Clinical Practice Guideline for the nonoperative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Guidelines like this help all health care professionals treating patients with knee arthritis using noninvasive approaches. Patient education, self-management techniques, physical therapy, and exercise are just a few ways this problem can be approached conservatively.
The 22 guidelines offered are based on an extensive review of published studies on this topic. A panel of 16 orthopedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers, sports specialists, and research analysts conducted the review of publications. Besides the recommendations, they also mention areas where research is lacking and ways future studies can be directed. The goal is to help health care practitioners guide patients in finding ways to treat knee arthritis short of having the joint replaced.
The authors make it clear that these guidelines are recommendations only. Each patient must be evaluated on his or her own merits, given the past history, current symptoms, past treatment and treatment results, and any important individual patient factors. When looking at the final guidelines as a whole, there are eight major groups or categories including: changes in lifestyle, rehabilitation, mechanical interventions, alternative therapies, pain relievers, joint injections, joint debridement (cleansing), and surgery (other than knee replacement).
The panel carefully reviewed the evidence for each guideline and graded the quality of that evidence as Level I (good), Levels II and III (fair), and Levels IV and V (poor). Once the 22 recommendations were developed, they were reviewed and commented on by various committees, patients and the public, as well as the AAOS Board of Directors. Here’s a brief summary of the major findings. If you have knee osteoarthritis:
muscles, especially the quadriceps muscle along the front of the knee.
your self-care program.
that have a built-in lateral heel wedge or lateral insoles. In this case, lateral means along the outside edge of the foot or shoe. These shoe adaptations shift the weight on to the medial aspect of the joint and make the problem worse.
Scientific evidence is lacking to make any specific recommendations about bracing to offset medial compartment arthritis or regarding the use of acupuncture for the painful symptoms of osteoarthritis. Either there wasn’t enough supportive evidence or the results of various studies were inconsistent and/or conflicting.
And despite all the media hype around taking glucosamine and/or chondroitin, these guidelines do NOT support the use of these supplements. There simply isn’t enough evidence to show any clinical benefit of these supplements for individuals with active knee arthritis. Some studies showed that taking a placebo (fake pill) was just as effective as taking the supplement. Other studies showed the glucosamine supplement was superior to taking a placebo. But stepping back and taking a look at the big picture from all the evidence available, the evidence doesn’t support the use of these products.
The best way to manage knee pain from osteoarthritis is with Tylenol or a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug such as ibuprofen. The risk of toxicity is low with these medications and they work better than a placebo. Antiinflammatories seem to be more effective than Tylenol but they have greater side effects such as gastrointestinal problems. If these medications are not sufficient to control pain, steroid injection into the joint might be of some short-term help. Steroid injections are not advised for long-term use.
Some patients have found pain relief with hyaluronic acid injections into the joint. This slippery substance is designed to help restore fluid movement of the joint. But, once again, the results of various studies have been inconclusive and unsupportive. Using a saline (salt) solution to clean the joint out is also not supported by the available evidence. This treatment technique (called needle lavage) doesn’t provide any more pain relief than a placebo or no treatment at all.
Several minor surgical procedures were also reviewed: arthroscopic removal of a torn meniscus (cartilage) and osteotomy. Removing any fragments, loose, or torn cartilage is considered an option. Tibial tubercle osteotomy refers to the removal of a bump of bone along the front of the knee, just below the kneecap. The pull of the quadriceps muscle over this bump may contribute to knee pain. The benefit of tibial tubercle osteotomy has not been proven conclusively. At this point, the recommendation for this surgery is based on expert opinion, not conclusive evidence.
A second type of osteotomy is the removal of a pie-shaped wedge of bone from the tibia (lower leg bone) and insertion of the same wedge on the other side of the joint. This procedure is called a realignment osteotomy. As its name suggests, it helps realign the knee joint by shifting the weight off one side of the joint and redistributing it more evenly to avoid further uneven joint wear and tear. This procedure has been used with good short-term results in patients with painful unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee from problems with alignment. It is considered another possible treatment option.
The final recommendation has to do with the use of a free-floating interpositional device placed within the knee to aid with painful unicompartmental arthritis. These devices hold the joint surfaces apart and act like a shock absorber. Australian surgeons have already stopped using these devices as there is enough evidence to show a higher rate of revision (second) surgeries from complications.
These guidelines as they are published today will be reviewed and revised again on a regular basis. The panel suggests that future research efforts should be directed toward developing high-quality studies that focus on patient-oriented outcomes (i.e., what the patient wants in the way of results). If researchers would all use the same standard outcome measures, it would be easier to compare the results of one study to another. Validated tools such as the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form were suggested.